This program is sponsored by the Center of Excellence for Children, Families and the Law and the Center for the Study of Psychology and Divorce at the Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology.
Honorable Christina Harms, J.D. (Ret.) and Robert Kinscherff, Ph.D., J.D., instructors
A court may determine that an adult is
in need of a legal guardian when that adult’s capacities for decision-making
are significantly compromised by psychiatric, medical or other disability. In cases where a legal guardian is appointed
by a court, that guardian then becomes the legal “client” for purposes of
informed consent, provision of care, termination and management of
confidentiality. Guardianship cases pose
challenges for courts, attorneys, Guardians ad Litem, family members, persons
with disabilities, appointed guardians, and medical, mental health and social
services providers. This workshop
reviews the law of guardianship and discusses the roles played by the court,
clinical and social services providers, attorneys, family members and others in
the process of establishing and implementing guardianship. Using an interactive “teaching case”
approach, the recent controversial case of Guardianship
of Mary Moe is presented to demonstrate a range of issues that can arise in
guardianship cases. This includes decisions
about mental health and medical care, use of social services, abortion and
other reproductive choices and life style choices. Strategies for effective professional
practice during or following guardianship proceedings are discussed for use in
professional practice by mental health professionals, legal professionals,
administrators of clinical and social services organizations and others. The roles and responsibilities of mental
health professionals, attorneys, guardians and others both before and following
a guardianship determination are also discussed.
Upon completion of the program the student will be able to:
· Identify
how to proceed if the client/patient is not capable of giving consent to
treatment
·
Distinguish
between “best interest” and “substituted judgment” standards in guardianship
law and the implications that has for professional practice
·
Explain
how to determine the nature and scope of the authority of an appointed guardian
·
Identify
the professional responsibilities before, during and after a guardianship
determination and the implications of these responsibilities for effective
professional practice
·
Explore
how to implement effective strategies for professional services to persons
under guardianship and to the guardian
Program Code: CPP6
6 CE Credits
Location: at MSPP, Newton
Christina
Harms, J.D., is a
graduate of Wellesley College and Harvard Law School. She has worked in the area of children and
families for her entire career. For six years she was General Counsel in the MA
Department of Social Services (now DCF) and was then appointed as a trial court
judge for the MA Probate and Family Court where she served 23 years. Judge Harms was the trial court judge who
heard the case of Guardianship of Mary
Moe, a controversial and challenging case involving a pregnant woman
diagnosed with schizophrenia.
Robert Kinscherff, PhD, Esq., is a forensic and clinical
psychologist and an attorney who has been a member of the MSPP faculty since
1999. He is Associate Vice President for Community Relations
at MSPP; Senior Associate for the National Center for Mental Health and
Juvenile Justice and a member of the Massachusetts Governor’s Juvenile Justice
Advisory Committee. Dr. Kinscherff has previously served as Director of
Clinical Services for Easter Seals of New Hampshire, Assistant Commissioner for
Forensic Mental Health (Massachusetts Department of Mental Health), Director of
Juvenile Court Clinic Services (Administrative Office of the Juvenile Court, MA
Trial Court), and Director of Adult Forensic Services (Psychiatry and Law
Program, Massachusetts General Hospital). For over a decade, he taught Forensic
Mental Health Law and Psychiatry and Law at Boston University Law School. For
the American Psychological Association, he has served as a past two-term Chair
of the Ethics Committee (EC), Chair of the Committee on Legal Issues (COLI) and
Member of the Committee on Professional Practices and Standards (COPPS). He is
a past member of the Board and the Editorial Board for the Society on Terrorism
Research and has been an invited participant on FBI and RAND Corporation
working groups involving the intersection of behavioral sciences, law enforcement
and national security. His research and professional practice areas include
ethical and professional practice issues in clinical and forensic mental health
practice, violence risk assessment and management, juvenile and adult sexual
offenders, serious delinquency and juvenile homicide, aggressive and sexually
problematic behaviors among youth and adults with developmental disabilities,
and severe and unusual forms of child maltreatment. His most recent publication
is a co-authored book entitled, APA
Ethics Code: Commentary and Case Illustrations. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association Press, 2009.