CONTENTS
FOREWORD — CHANGE IS CONSTANT IN ESTATE PLANNING: REFLECTIONS OF AN ACTEC LAW JOURNAL EDITOR Bridget J. Crawford
POWERS OF ATTORNEY UNDER THE UNIFORM POWER OF ATTORNEY ACT INCLUDING REFERENCE TO VIRGINIA LAW F. Philip Manns, Jr.
DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS: AN UPDATE Richard C. Ausness
ET TU (A)(2)? BLATTMACHR & GANS DISMANTLE TAX COURT’S POWELL ANALYSIS N. Todd Angkatavanich, James I. Dougherty and Eric Fischer
COMMENTARY Ronald H. Jensen
POWELL AND SECTION 2036: OUR REPLY Mitchell M. Gans and Jonathan G. Blattmachr
THE NEW YORK REVISED STATUTES’ TRUST CODE AND THE PATH OF THE COMMON LAW Alfred L. Brophy
A COMMENT ON MODERNIZING NEW YORK TRUST LAW C. Raymond Radigan and Jennifer F. Hillman
ELEGY William P. LaPiana
A RESPONSE TO DEMOCRACY AND TRUSTS Jake Calvert
“UNDEMOCRATIC” TRUSTS AND THE NUMERUS CLAUSUS PRINCIPLE E. Gary Spitko
TRUST FLEXIBILITY AND THE ROLE OF COURTS IN LIMITING PROPERTY FORMS Carla Spivack
INTESTACY, WILLS, AND INTENT: A SHORT COMMENT ON WRIGHT & STERNER David Horton
RESPONSE: A MODERN ASSESSMENT OF INTESTACY LAW ames G. Pressly, Jr. and J. Grier Pressly, III
RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR HORTON, MR. JAMES PRESSLY AND MR. J. GRIER PRESSLY Danaya C. Wright and Beth Sterner